Opteron 3380 vs Xeon Bronze 3104

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 3380

8 / 8

4,358

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Bronze 3104

6 / 6

4,383

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon Bronze 3104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 3380

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,358 vs 4,383).
❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3104 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Bronze 3104

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3380 better than Xeon Bronze 3104?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 3380 is ahead with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3104 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3104 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3380 is the better buy right now. Opteron 3380 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $229 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Bronze 3104 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 3380

The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Bronze 3104

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 3380 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 3380 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — a 71.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 3380 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Opteron 3380 uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3380 scores 4,358 against the Xeon Bronze 3104's 4,383 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3104. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104.

Feature	Opteron 3380	Xeon Bronze 3104
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+112%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+53%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	8.25 MB+3%
L2 Cache	8192 kB+33%	6 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Delhi (2012−2013)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	4,358	4,383

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3380 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.