Opteron 3380 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 3380

8 / 8

4,358

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-1603 v4

4 / 4

4,355

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 3380

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1603 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1603 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,355 vs 4,358).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3380 better than Xeon E5-1603 v4?

Yes. Opteron 3380 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3380 is the better buy right now. Opteron 3380 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $229 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1603 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 3380 vs Xeon E5-1603 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 3380

The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-1603 v4

The Xeon E5-1603 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 4,355 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 3380 is built on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Opteron 3380 scores 4,358 against the Xeon E5-1603 v4's 4,355 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 3380.

Feature	Opteron 3380	Xeon E5-1603 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	—
L2 Cache	8192 kB	—
Process	32 nm	—
Architecture	Delhi (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	4,358	4,355