Opteron 3380
VS
Core i5-3475S

Opteron 3380 vs Core i5-3475S

AMD

Opteron 3380

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-3475S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3380 is positioned at rank 79 and the Core i5-3475S is on rank 859, so the Opteron 3380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3380

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1908%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
360%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
320%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
247%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
99%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
94%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
93%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
91%
#79
Opteron 3380
MSRP: $229|Avg: $427
100%
#82
Xeon W-10855M
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
95%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
93%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
93%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
91%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3475S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17987%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12340%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3718%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2945%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2576%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1475%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1456%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1326%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1326%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1311%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1276%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1258%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1253%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1241%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
95%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
100%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
100%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
100%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
99%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
99%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
98%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
98%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
98%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
97%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
96%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
96%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
96%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
95%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 3380 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-3475S in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightOpteron 3380Core i5-3475S
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($427)
More affordable ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i5-3475S holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $42 (vs $427), it costs 90% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 907% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Opteron 3380.
InsightOpteron 3380Core i5-3475S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+907%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($427)
More affordable ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3380 and Core i5-3475S

AMD

Opteron 3380

The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-3475S

The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3380 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-3475S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3380 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Opteron 3380 uses the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3475S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3380 scores 4,358 against the Core i5-3475S's 4,315 — a 1% lead for the Opteron 3380. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3475S.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i5-3475S
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Delhi (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,358
4,315
Geekbench 6 Single
705
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3380 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3475S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i5-3475S
Socket
AM3+
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3380) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S). The Core i5-3475S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Opteron 3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3475S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i5-3475S
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Opteron 3380 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Core i5-3475S debuted at $249. At current prices ($427 vs $42), the Core i5-3475S is $385 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 3380 delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 102.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-3475S — making the Core i5-3475S the 163.9% better value option.

FeatureOpteron 3380Core i5-3475S
MSRP
$229-8%
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$427
$42-90%
Performance per Dollar
10.2
102.7+907%
Release Date
2012
2012