Opteron 6274 vs Xeon E5649

AMD

Opteron 6274

16 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5649

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Opteron 6274 vs Xeon E5649 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6274 vs Xeon E5649 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6274 vs Xeon E5649: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6274

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $135 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $774 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $774 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,643 vs 5,659).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 43.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 80W.

Xeon E5649

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 80W instead of 115W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 8.8 PassMark/$ ($774 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5649 better than Opteron 6274?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6274 is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5649 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5649 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5649 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5649 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6274 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5649 comes in 21.1% more expensive on MSRP at $774 MSRP versus $639 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6274 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6274 is also 20.8% better value on MSRP (8.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5649 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Opteron 6274 vs Xeon E5649 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Opteron 6274

The Opteron 6274 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,643 points. Launch price was $909.

Intel

Xeon E5649

The Xeon E5649 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,659 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Opteron 6274 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5649 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6274 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Opteron 6274 versus 2.93 GHz on the Xeon E5649 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Opteron 6274 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Opteron 6274 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5649 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6274 scores 5,643 against the Xeon E5649's 5,659 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5649. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6274 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon E5649.

FeatureOpteron 6274Xeon E5649
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+167%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+6%
2.93 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.53 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12288 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
8.00391 MB (per core)+3102%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Interlagos (2011−2012)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
5,643
5,659
Geekbench 6 Single
415
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,109
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6274 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5649 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 6274Xeon E5649
Socket
G34
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3 1333 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6274) / true (Xeon E5649). Primary use case: Xeon E5649 targets Server.

FeatureOpteron 6274Xeon E5649
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6274 was priced at $639, while the Xeon E5649 came in at $774. On launch pricing ($639 vs $774), Opteron 6274 was $135 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6274 delivers 8.8 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5649 — making the Opteron 6274 the 18.8% better value option.

FeatureOpteron 6274Xeon E5649
MSRP
$639-17%
$774
Performance per Dollar
8.8+21%
7.3
Release Date
2011
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.