Opteron 6376 vs Core i5-4670K
Opteron 6376
Core i5-4670K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 6376 is positioned at rank 63 and the Core i5-4670K is on rank 865, so the Opteron 6376 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6376
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 6376 | Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($703) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Abu Dhabi (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 6376 | Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+252%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($703) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6376 and Core i5-4670K
Opteron 6376
The Opteron 6376 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,572 points. Launch price was $750.
Core i5-4670K
The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.
Processing Power
The Opteron 6376 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-4670K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6376 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6376 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670K (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Opteron 6376 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4670K uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6376 scores 5,572 against the Core i5-4670K's 5,584 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-4670K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6376 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670K.
| Feature | Opteron 6376 | Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+300% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+6300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,572 | 5,584 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 975 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 6376 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4670K uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 6376 | Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G34 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6376) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 6376 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370.
| Feature | Opteron 6376 | Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Opteron 6376 launched at $703 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670K debuted at $328.
| Feature | Opteron 6376 | Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $703 | $328-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 6376 and Core i5-4670K
