Opteron 6376 vs Xeon W-2104

Opteron 6376 vs Xeon W-2104 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6376

16 / 16

5,572

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon W-2104

4 / 4

5,530

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6376 vs Xeon W-2104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6376 vs Xeon W-2104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6376

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 115W instead of 120W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($703 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Xeon W-2104

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $409 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $703 MSRP).
✅Delivers 137.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $703 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6376 across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,530 vs 5,572).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6376 better than Xeon W-2104?

Yes. Opteron 6376 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.2% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6376 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.2% more average FPS across 20 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6376 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6376 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2104 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Opteron 6376 comes in 139.1% more expensive on MSRP at $703 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.2% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-2104 is also 137.3% better value on MSRP (18.8 vs 7.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6376 vs Xeon W-2104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6376

The Opteron 6376 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,572 points. Launch price was $750.

Xeon W-2104

The Xeon W-2104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,530 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6376 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2104 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6376 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6376 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2104 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Opteron 6376 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W-2104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6376 scores 5,572 against the Xeon W-2104's 5,530 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6376. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6376 vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2104.

Feature	Opteron 6376	Xeon W-2104
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+300%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8.25 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache	16 MB+1500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,572	5,530

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6376 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W-2104 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6376	Xeon W-2104
Socket	G34	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6376 was priced at $703, while the Xeon W-2104 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($703 vs $294), Xeon W-2104 was $409 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6376 delivers 7.9 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2104 — making the Xeon W-2104 the 81.4% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6376	Xeon W-2104
MSRP	$703	$294-58%
Performance per Dollar	7.9	18.8+138%
Release Date	2012	2017

Search Opteron 6376 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2104 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.