P106-090 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

P106-090

2017Core: 1354 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2020Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

P106-090

2,466

+2.8%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2,400

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-090 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar P106-090

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

99%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

97%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

96%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

95%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

92%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

88%

#168

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2330%

#183

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

100%

#184

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

100%

#185

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#187

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

98%

#189

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

97%

#190

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

97%

#192

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

96%

#195

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

92%

#196

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P106-090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.

Insight	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (250mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $30 for the P106-090, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 46% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+46%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P106-090 Benchmark Check

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P106-090 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

P106-090

The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P106-090 scores 2,466 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-090 is built on Pascal while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 16 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (P106-090) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
G3D Mark Score	2,466+3%	2,400
Architecture	Pascal	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	16 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	768+1500%	48
Boost Clock	1531 MHz+6%	1450 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P106-090 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 0 MB. The P106-090 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (P106-090) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: NVDEC vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).

Feature	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	Quick Sync (Tiger Lake)
Decoder	NVDEC	Quick Sync (Tiger Lake)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-090 draws 75W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 91.3% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-090) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 85.

Feature	P106-090	UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
TDP	75W	28W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	250mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60°C-29%	85
Perf/Watt	32.9	85.7+160%

💰

Value Analysis

The P106-090 launched at $389 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.2 (P106-090) vs 120.0 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers 46% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).