
FireStream 9370

P106-090
FireStream 9370 vs P106-090 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9370 vs P106-090 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9370 vs P106-090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9370
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌105.7% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$389 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
P106-090
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $411 less on MSRP ($389 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($389 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9370 vs P106-090 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the P106-090 reaches 2,466 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the P106-090 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 768 (P106-090). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528+3% | 2,466 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+108% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+12% | 2.352 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 288 KB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the P106-090 carries 2 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 64-bit on the P106-090. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 1.5 MB (P106-090) — the P106-090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 12 (P106-090). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the P106-090's 75W — a 100% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (P106-090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 32.9+194% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the P106-090 launched at $389. On MSRP, P106-090 was 51.4% cheaper ($411 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 6.3 (P106-090) — the P106-090 offers 96.9% better value. The newer card here is P106-090 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $389-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 6.3+97% |
| Codename | Cypress | GP106 |
| Release | June 23 2010 | July 31 2017 |
| Ranking | #631 | #639 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














