Pentium 2020M vs Turion II Neo K685

Pentium 2020M vs Turion II Neo K685 Performance Spectrum

Pentium 2020M

2 / 2

1,412

0.0%

1,424

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 2020M vs Turion II Neo K685 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 2020M vs Turion II Neo K685: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 2020M

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Turion II Neo K685 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II Neo K685 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,412 vs 1,424).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Turion II Neo K685 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion II Neo K685

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium 2020M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Neo K685 better than Pentium 2020M?

Yes. Turion II Neo K685 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II Neo K685 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Neo K685 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Neo K685 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion II Neo K685 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium 2020M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 2020M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium 2020M vs Turion II Neo K685 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 2020M

The Pentium 2020M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,412 points. Launch price was $134.

Turion II Neo K685

The Turion II Neo K685 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,424 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 2020M and Turion II Neo K685 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 2020M versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion II Neo K685 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium 2020M. The Pentium 2020M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion II Neo K685 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 2020M scores 1,412 against the Turion II Neo K685's 1,424 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion II Neo K685.

Feature	Pentium 2020M	Turion II Neo K685
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+33%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,412	1,424
Geekbench 6 Single	391	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	667	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 2020M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II Neo K685 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium 2020M	Turion II Neo K685
Socket	PGA988	S1g4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / EPT (Pentium 2020M) / not specified (Turion II Neo K685). The Pentium 2020M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Turion II Neo K685 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium 2020M targets Budget.