Pentium 3825U
VS
Core 2 Duo E6550

Pentium 3825U vs Core 2 Duo E6550

Intel

Pentium 3825U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6550

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3825U is positioned at rank 886 and the Core 2 Duo E6550 is on rank 1022, so the Pentium 3825U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3825U

#874
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1471%
#875
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1450%
#876
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1331%
#877
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1325%
#878
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1313%
#880
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1268%
#881
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1216%
#882
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1214%
#883
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1181%
#886
Pentium 3825U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
99%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
98%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
98%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
97%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
36415%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
34409%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24984%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7527%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5962%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5215%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2987%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2948%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2684%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2684%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2654%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2582%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2546%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2536%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2513%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
90%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
100%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
98%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
98%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
94%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
94%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
94%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
94%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
93%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
91%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
91%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
89%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
89%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium 3825U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium 3825UCore 2 Duo E6550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6550 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium 3825UCore 2 Duo E6550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3825U and Core 2 Duo E6550

Intel

Pentium 3825U

The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6550

The Core 2 Duo E6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Pentium 3825U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E6550's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6550 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6550 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Pentium 3825U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3825U scores 1,396 against the Core 2 Duo E6550's 1,395 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 3825U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6550.

FeaturePentium 3825UCore 2 Duo E6550
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.33 GHz+23%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.33 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,396
1,395
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3825U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3825UCore 2 Duo E6550
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 3825U) / true (Core 2 Duo E6550). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6550 rivals Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

FeaturePentium 3825UCore 2 Duo E6550
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true