Pentium 3825U vs Pentium G6951

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium G6951 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium G6951: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 3825U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌601.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 73W.

Pentium G6951

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 73W instead of 512W, a 439W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,383 vs 1,396).
❌Launch MSRP is still $89 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G6951 better than Pentium 3825U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G6951 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3825U pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Pentium G6951 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3825U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G6951 is the better buy right now. Pentium G6951 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $89 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium 3825U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3825U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium G6951 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 3825U

The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

Pentium G6951

The Pentium G6951 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,383 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 3825U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G6951's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6951 — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G6951 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium 3825U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G6951 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3825U scores 1,396 against the Pentium G6951's 1,383 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium 3825U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G6951.

Feature	Pentium 3825U	Pentium G6951
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.8 GHz+47%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.8 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,396	1,383

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3825U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G6951 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.