Pentium 3825U
VS
Pentium G6951

Pentium 3825U vs Pentium G6951

Intel

Pentium 3825U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Pentium G6951

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3825U is positioned at rank 886 and the Pentium G6951 is on rank 892, so the Pentium 3825U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3825U

#874
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1471%
#875
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1450%
#876
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1331%
#877
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1325%
#878
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1313%
#880
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1268%
#881
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1216%
#882
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1214%
#883
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1181%
#886
Pentium 3825U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
99%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
98%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
98%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
97%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G6951

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20059%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18954%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13762%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4146%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3284%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2873%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1645%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1624%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1479%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1479%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1462%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1423%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1403%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1397%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1384%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
95%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
100%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
99%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
99%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
98%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
95%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
94%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
94%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G6951 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 3825U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 3825UPentium G6951
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium 3825UPentium G6951
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3825U and Pentium G6951

Intel

Pentium 3825U

The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Pentium G6951

The Pentium G6951 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,383 points. Launch price was $94.

Processing Power

The Pentium 3825U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G6951's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6951 — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G6951 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium 3825U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G6951 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3825U scores 1,396 against the Pentium G6951's 1,383 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium 3825U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G6951.

FeaturePentium 3825UPentium G6951
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz+47%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz+47%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,396
1,383
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3825U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G6951 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3825UPentium G6951
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0