Pentium 4 2.40 vs Celeron 2.40
Pentium 4 2.40
Celeron 2.40
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 4 2.40 is positioned at rank 1108 and the Celeron 2.40 is on rank 1072, so the Celeron 2.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium 4 2.40
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.40
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($193) | ✅ More affordable ($13) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1476%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($193) | ✅ More affordable ($13) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 4 2.40 and Celeron 2.40
Pentium 4 2.40
The Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 2.40
The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium 4 2.40 and Celeron 2.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.40 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture using a 90 nm process. In PassMark, the Pentium 4 2.40 scores 325 against the Celeron 2.40's 345 — a 6% lead for the Celeron 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+700% | 128 kB |
| Process | 90 nm-31% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 325 | 345+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 150 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Pentium 4 2.40 versus DDR1-333 on the Celeron 2.40 — the Pentium 4 2.40 supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 4 2.40 supports up to 4 of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Socket 478 (Pentium 4 2.40) and Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40).
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+39900% | DDR1-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 2 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: false (Pentium 4 2.40) vs None (Celeron 2.40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Pentium 4 2.40 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Celeron 2.40 debuted at $69. At current prices ($193 vs $13), the Celeron 2.40 is $180 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 4 2.40 delivers 1.7 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 2.40 — making the Celeron 2.40 the 176.1% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $69-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $193 | $13-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 26.5+1459% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2003 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium 4 2.40 and Celeron 2.40
