Pentium 4 2.40 vs Celeron 220
Pentium 4 2.40
Celeron 220
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 4 2.40 is positioned at rank 1108 and the Celeron 220 is on rank 1143, so the Pentium 4 2.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium 4 2.40
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 220
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($193) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+352%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($193) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 4 2.40 and Celeron 220
Pentium 4 2.40
The Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 220
The Celeron 220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium 4 2.40 and Celeron 220 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.40 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron 220 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.40. The Pentium 4 2.40 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron 220 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4 2.40 scores 325 against the Celeron 220's 320 — a 1.6% lead for the Pentium 4 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+100% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 325+2% | 320 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium 4 2.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 220 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Pentium 4 2.40 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 220 — the Pentium 4 2.40 supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Socket 478 (Pentium 4 2.40) and 945G,G31,G41 (Celeron 220).
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 4 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: false (Pentium 4 2.40) vs No (Celeron 220). Primary use case: Celeron 220 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 220 rivals Athlon 64 3100+.
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium 4 2.40 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Celeron 220 debuted at $42. At current prices ($193 vs $42), the Celeron 220 is $151 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 4 2.40 delivers 1.7 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 220 — making the Celeron 220 the 127.6% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium 4 2.40 | Celeron 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $42-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $193 | $42-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 7.6+347% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium 4 2.40 and Celeron 220
