Pentium 967 vs Turion X2 RM-72

Pentium 967 vs Turion X2 RM-72 Performance Spectrum

Pentium 967

2 / 2

1,640

+0.8%

1,627

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 967 vs Turion X2 RM-72 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 967 vs Turion X2 RM-72: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 967

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-72 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Turion X2 RM-72

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,627 vs 1,640).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 967 better than Turion X2 RM-72?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion X2 RM-72 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 967 is the better buy right now. Pentium 967 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion X2 RM-72 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 967 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium 967 vs Turion X2 RM-72 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

Turion X2 RM-72

The Turion X2 RM-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,627 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 967 and Turion X2 RM-72 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 versus 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-72 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-72. The Pentium 967 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-72 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 967 scores 1,640 against the Turion X2 RM-72's 1,627 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium 967. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 967 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-72.

Feature	Pentium 967	Turion X2 RM-72
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.1 GHz+62%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,640	1,627

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 967 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-72 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.