Pentium D 950
VS
Celeron P4600

Pentium D 950 vs Celeron P4600

Intel

Pentium D 950

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Celeron P4600

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium D 950 is positioned at rank 1110 and the Celeron P4600 is on rank 1050, so the Celeron P4600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
212051%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
200367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
145483%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
43828%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
34716%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
30370%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
17395%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
17167%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
15631%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
15630%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
15455%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
15038%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
14828%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
14768%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
14634%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
100%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
99%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
95%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
86%
#1114
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
85%
#1115
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
85%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
84%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
83%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
82%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
80%
#1120
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
80%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
79%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
76%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
75%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
70%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron P4600

#1038
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2615%
#1039
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2577%
#1040
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2365%
#1041
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2355%
#1042
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2333%
#1044
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2253%
#1045
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2160%
#1046
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2157%
#1047
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2099%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
99%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
98%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
97%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
96%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
96%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
95%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
95%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
95%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
94%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium D 950 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron P4600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium D 950Celeron P4600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium D 950 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 33% cheaper ($10 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium D 950Celeron P4600
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+45%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium D 950 and Celeron P4600

Intel

Pentium D 950

The Pentium D 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $637.

Intel

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium D 950 and Celeron P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Pentium D 950 versus 0.1 GHz on the Celeron P4600 — a 188.6% clock advantage for the Pentium D 950 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium D 950 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron P4600 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium D 950 scores 935 against the Celeron P4600's 965 — a 3.2% lead for the Celeron P4600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium D 950 vs 2 MB on the Celeron P4600.

FeaturePentium D 950Celeron P4600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+3300%
0.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+70%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark
935
965+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium D 950 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium D 950Celeron P4600
Socket
LGA775
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium D 950) / true (Celeron P4600). The Celeron P4600 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Pentium D 950 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.

FeaturePentium D 950Celeron P4600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium D 950 launched at $637 MSRP, while the Celeron P4600 debuted at $86. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Pentium D 950 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium D 950 delivers 93.5 pts/$ vs 64.3 pts/$ for the Celeron P4600 — making the Pentium D 950 the 37% better value option.

FeaturePentium D 950Celeron P4600
MSRP
$637
$86-86%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
93.5+45%
64.3
Release Date
2006
2010