Pentium D 950 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Pentium D 950
Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium D 950 is positioned at rank 1110 and the Core 2 Duo E7200 is on rank 1040, so the Core 2 Duo E7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 950
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium D 950 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium D 950 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1141%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium D 950 and Core 2 Duo E7200
Pentium D 950
The Pentium D 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $637.
Core 2 Duo E7200
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium D 950 and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Pentium D 950 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Pentium D 950 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Pentium D 950 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium D 950 scores 935 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 6.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium D 950 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+34% | 2.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+34% | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 935 | 1,002+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 368 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 666 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Pentium D 950 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium D 950) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7200). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Pentium D 950 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Pentium D 950 launched at $637 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7200 debuted at $133. At current prices ($10 vs $133), the Pentium D 950 is $123 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium D 950 delivers 93.5 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7200 — making the Pentium D 950 the 170.2% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium D 950 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $637 | $133-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-92% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 93.5+1147% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium D 950 and Core 2 Duo E7200
