Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Athlon X4 950
Pentium Dual Core T3200
Athlon X4 950
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is positioned at rank 375 and the Athlon X4 950 is on rank 344, so the Athlon X4 950 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 950
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Athlon X4 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Athlon X4 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+202%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Athlon X4 950
Pentium Dual Core T3200
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon X4 950
The Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,576 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon X4 950 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 950 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 950. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X4 950 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 scores 3,600 against the Athlon X4 950's 3,576 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 235 vs 656, a 94.5% lead for the Athlon X4 950 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 408 vs 1,637 (120.2% advantage for the Athlon X4 950).
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Athlon X4 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+90% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,600 | 3,576 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 235 | 656+179% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 408 | 1,637+301% |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon X4 950 — the Athlon X4 950 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) vs 8 (Athlon X4 950) — the Athlon X4 950 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) and Socket AM4 (Athlon X4 950).
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Athlon X4 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-2400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 64 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: No (Pentium Dual Core T3200) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 950).
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Athlon X4 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 launched at $64 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 950 debuted at $58. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 delivers 720.0 pts/$ vs 238.4 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 950 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3200 the 100.5% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Athlon X4 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $64 | $58-9% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-67% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 720.0+202% | 238.4 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Athlon X4 950
