Pentium Dual Core T3200
VS
Core i3-4350

Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Core i3-4350

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-4350

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is positioned at rank 375 and the Core i3-4350 is on rank 657, so the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200

#363
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
522%
#364
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
514%
#365
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
472%
#366
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
470%
#367
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
465%
#369
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
449%
#370
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
431%
#371
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
430%
#372
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
419%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4350

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11911%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8172%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2462%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1950%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1706%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
977%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
964%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
878%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
878%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
868%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
845%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
833%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
830%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
822%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
100%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
98%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
100%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
100%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
100%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
100%
#662
Core i5-6600K
MSRP: $242|Avg: $105
100%
#663
Core i5-4440
MSRP: $184|Avg: $101
99%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
99%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
99%
#666
Core i5-7400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $78
99%
#667
Core i5-4670
MSRP: $213|Avg: $65
99%
#668
Core i5-4570S
MSRP: $195|Avg: $40
98%
#669
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
#671
Core i5-6500TE
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-4350 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium Dual Core T3200Core i3-4350
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($130)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium Dual Core T3200Core i3-4350
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2492%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($130)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Core i3-4350

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-4350

The Core i3-4350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,611 points. Launch price was $170.

Processing Power

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4350's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4350 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-4350. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-4350 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 scores 3,600 against the Core i3-4350's 3,611 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-4350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 235 vs 951, a 120.7% lead for the Core i3-4350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 408 vs 1,827 (127% advantage for the Core i3-4350).

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i3-4350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,600
3,611
Geekbench 6 Single
235
951+305%
Geekbench 6 Multi
408
1,827+348%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4350 — the Core i3-4350 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4350 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) vs 16 (Core i3-4350) — the Core i3-4350 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4350).

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i3-4350
Socket
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
32 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: No (Pentium Dual Core T3200) vs VT-x (Core i3-4350). The Core i3-4350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350 targets Office Desktop.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i3-4350
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
No
VT-x
Target Use
Office Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 launched at $64 MSRP, while the Core i3-4350 debuted at $138. At current prices ($5 vs $130), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is $125 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 delivers 720.0 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-4350 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3200 the 185.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i3-4350
MSRP
$64-54%
$138
Avg Price (30d)
$5-96%
$130
Performance per Dollar
720.0+2490%
27.8
Release Date
2008
2014