Pentium Dual Core T3200
VS
Core i7-2630QM

Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Core i7-2630QM

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i7-2630QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is positioned at rank 375 and the Core i7-2630QM is on rank 1094, so the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200

#363
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
522%
#364
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
514%
#365
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
472%
#366
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
470%
#367
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
465%
#369
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
449%
#370
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
431%
#371
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
430%
#372
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
419%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2630QM

#1082
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3125%
#1083
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3079%
#1084
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2826%
#1085
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2814%
#1086
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2788%
#1088
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2692%
#1089
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2581%
#1090
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2577%
#1091
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2508%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
99%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-2630QM leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium Dual Core T3200Core i7-2630QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 99% cheaper ($5 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium Dual Core T3200Core i7-2630QM
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+7566%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Core i7-2630QM

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2630QM

The Core i7-2630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-2630QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2630QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2630QM — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-2630QM. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-2630QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 scores 3,600 against the Core i7-2630QM's 3,550 — a 1.4% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i7-2630QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.9 GHz+45%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,600+1%
3,550
Geekbench 6 Single
235
Geekbench 6 Multi
408
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus 1600 on the Core i7-2630QM — the Core i7-2630QM supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-2630QM supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) vs 16 (Core i7-2630QM) — the Core i7-2630QM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2630QM).

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i7-2630QM
Socket
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
1600+79900%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+13107100%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: No (Pentium Dual Core T3200) vs true (Core i7-2630QM). The Core i7-2630QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2630QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i7-2630QM
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
No
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 launched at $64 MSRP, while the Core i7-2630QM debuted at $378.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T3200Core i7-2630QM
MSRP
$64-83%
$378
Avg Price (30d)
$5
Release Date
2008
2011