Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Xeon E3110

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3110

65 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Xeon E3110 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Xeon E3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Xeon E3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $107 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $214 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $214 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,284 vs 1,295).

Xeon E3110

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($214 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
    • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon E3110 better than Pentium Dual Core T4400?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium Dual Core T4400 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon E3110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3110 comes in 100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $214 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core T4400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 98.3% better value on paper (12.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium Dual Core T4400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Xeon E3110 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual Core T4400

    The Pentium Dual Core T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Xeon E3110

    The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Pentium Dual Core T4400 is built on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T4400 scores 1,284 against the Xeon E3110's 1,295 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3110. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4400Xeon E3110
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz
    3 GHz+36%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    6 MB L2 Cache
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    1,284
    1,295
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon E3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4400Xeon E3110
    Socket
    P
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Pentium Dual Core T4400 was priced at $107, while the Xeon E3110 came in at $214. On launch pricing ($107 vs $214), Pentium Dual Core T4400 was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core T4400 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3110 — making the Pentium Dual Core T4400 the 65.9% better value option.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4400Xeon E3110
    MSRP
    $107-50%
    $214
    Performance per Dollar
    12.0+97%
    6.1
    Release Date
    2009
    2008

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.