Celeron E3500
VS
Pentium Dual Core T4400

Celeron E3500 vs Pentium Dual Core T4400

Intel

Celeron E3500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E3500 is positioned at rank 778 and the Pentium Dual Core T4400 is on rank 1034, so the Celeron E3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14979%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14154%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10277%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3096%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2145%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1229%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1213%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1092%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1062%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1047%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1043%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1034%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
100%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
100%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
100%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
99%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
98%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
98%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4400

#1022
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2445%
#1023
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2409%
#1024
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2212%
#1025
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2202%
#1026
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2182%
#1028
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2107%
#1029
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2020%
#1030
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2017%
#1031
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1963%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
100%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
99%
#1038
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
97%
#1039
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
96%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
94%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron E3500 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium Dual Core T4400 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron E3500Pentium Dual Core T4400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Pentium Dual Core T4400 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $10), it costs 50% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 99% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron E3500.
InsightCeleron E3500Pentium Dual Core T4400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+99%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E3500 and Pentium Dual Core T4400

Intel

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4400

The Pentium Dual Core T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3500 and Pentium Dual Core T4400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4400 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron E3500 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3500 scores 1,290 against the Pentium Dual Core T4400's 1,284 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron E3500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron E3500Pentium Dual Core T4400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+23%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+23%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,290
1,284
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron E3500Pentium Dual Core T4400
Socket
LGA775
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron E3500) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core T4400). Primary use case: Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureCeleron E3500Pentium Dual Core T4400
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron E3500 launched at $62 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T4400 debuted at $107. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Pentium Dual Core T4400 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3500 delivers 129.0 pts/$ vs 256.8 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T4400 — making the Pentium Dual Core T4400 the 66.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron E3500Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP
$62-42%
$107
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$5-50%
Performance per Dollar
129.0
256.8+99%
Release Date
2010
2009