Celeron E3500 vs Xeon E3110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3500 vs Xeon E3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3500 vs Xeon E3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $152 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 243.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.8 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $214 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,290 vs 1,295).

Xeon E3110

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($214 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3110 better than Celeron E3500?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron E3500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3110 comes in 245.2% more expensive on MSRP at $214 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E3500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 243.8% better value on paper (20.8 vs 6.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E3500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron E3500 vs Xeon E3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

Xeon E3110

The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron E3500 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron E3500 scores 1,290 against the Xeon E3110's 1,295 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3110. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3500 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110.

Feature	Celeron E3500	Xeon E3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	—
PassMark	1,290	1,295
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	624	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron E3500	Xeon E3110
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron E3500) / not specified (Xeon E3110). Primary use case: Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.

Feature	Celeron E3500	Xeon E3110
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E3500 was priced at $62, while the Xeon E3110 came in at $214. On launch pricing ($62 vs $214), Celeron E3500 was $152 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3500 delivers 20.8 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3110 — making the Celeron E3500 the 109.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E3500	Xeon E3110
MSRP	$62-71%	$214
Performance per Dollar	20.8+241%	6.1
Release Date	2010	2008

Search Celeron E3500 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3110 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.