Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Xeon L3110

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4500

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon L3110

45 WW2009
Similar parts
·······

Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Xeon L3110 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium Dual Core T4500

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 565.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.9 vs 1.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,336 vs 1,338).

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
    • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon L3110 better than Pentium Dual Core T4500?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium Dual Core T4500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon L3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon L3110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon L3110 comes in 566.7% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core T4500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 565.7% better value on paper (8.9 vs 1.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium Dual Core T4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual Core T4500

    The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,336 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Xeon L3110

    The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is built on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T4500 scores 1,336 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon L3110. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4500Xeon L3110
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.3 GHz
    3 GHz+30%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    6 MB L2 Cache
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    1,336
    1,338
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon L3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4500Xeon L3110
    Socket
    P
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4500) / not specified (Xeon L3110). Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T4500 targets Mobile.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4500Xeon L3110
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    No VT-x
    Target Use
    Mobile
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Pentium Dual Core T4500 was priced at $150, while the Xeon L3110 came in at $1000. On launch pricing ($150 vs $1000), Pentium Dual Core T4500 was $850 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core T4500 delivers 8.9 pts/$ vs 1.3 pts/$ for the Xeon L3110 — making the Pentium Dual Core T4500 the 147.8% better value option.

    FeaturePentium Dual Core T4500Xeon L3110
    MSRP
    $150-85%
    $1000
    Performance per Dollar
    8.9+585%
    1.3
    Release Date
    2010
    2009

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.