Celeron 3865U
VS
Pentium Dual Core T4500

Celeron 3865U vs Pentium Dual Core T4500

Intel

Celeron 3865U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4500

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3865U is positioned at rank 645 and the Pentium Dual Core T4500 is on rank 1108, so the Celeron 3865U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3865U

#633
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
874%
#634
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
861%
#635
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
790%
#636
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
787%
#637
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
780%
#639
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
753%
#640
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
722%
#641
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
721%
#642
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
701%
#645
Celeron 3865U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4500

#1096
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3293%
#1097
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3245%
#1098
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2979%
#1099
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2965%
#1100
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2938%
#1102
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2837%
#1103
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2721%
#1104
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2716%
#1105
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2643%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
99%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
98%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
97%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
96%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
94%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3865U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3865UPentium Dual Core T4500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3865UPentium Dual Core T4500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3865U and Pentium Dual Core T4500

Intel

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4500

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,336 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3865U and Pentium Dual Core T4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T4500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the Pentium Dual Core T4500's 1,336 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 3865U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3865U vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4500.

FeatureCeleron 3865UPentium Dual Core T4500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz+28%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,343
1,336
Geekbench 6 Single
389
Geekbench 6 Multi
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3865U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 on the Celeron 3865U versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4500 — the Celeron 3865U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3865U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3865U) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4500) — the Celeron 3865U offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron 3865UPentium Dual Core T4500
Socket
BGA1356
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866+33%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4500). The Celeron 3865U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium Dual Core T4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level, Pentium Dual Core T4500 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.

FeatureCeleron 3865UPentium Dual Core T4500
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
No VT-x
Target Use
Entry-level
Mobile