Pentium G3258
VS
Core 2 Duo T7250

Pentium G3258 vs Core 2 Duo T7250

Intel

Pentium G3258

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G3258 is positioned at rank 632 and the Core 2 Duo T7250 is on rank 20, so the Core 2 Duo T7250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3258

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11331%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10707%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7774%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2342%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1855%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
929%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
917%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
835%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
835%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
826%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
804%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
792%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
789%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
782%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#633
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#634
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#635
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#636
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#637
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#638
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7250

#8
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
142%
#9
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
139%
#10
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
128%
#11
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
127%
#12
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
126%
#14
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
122%
#15
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
117%
#16
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
117%
#17
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
114%
#20
Core 2 Duo T7250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
92%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
88%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
88%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
84%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
84%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
83%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
82%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
82%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
82%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G3258 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium G3258Core 2 Duo T7250
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7250 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium G3258Core 2 Duo T7250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G3258 and Core 2 Duo T7250

Intel

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7250

The Core 2 Duo T7250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,073 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G3258 and Core 2 Duo T7250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7250 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium G3258 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7250 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3258 scores 2,063 against the Core 2 Duo T7250's 2,073 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7250. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7250.

FeaturePentium G3258Core 2 Duo T7250
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,063
2,073
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3258 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3258 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7250 — the Pentium G3258 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support.

FeaturePentium G3258Core 2 Duo T7250
Socket
LGA1150
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Pentium G3258 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo T7250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop, Core 2 Duo T7250 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7250 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

FeaturePentium G3258Core 2 Duo T7250
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
Budget