Pentium G3258 vs Phenom II X4 830

Pentium G3258 vs Phenom II X4 830 Performance Spectrum

Pentium G3258

2 / 2

2,063

0.0%

Celeron E3300

Core Duo T2300

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,072

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G3258 vs Phenom II X4 830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G3258 vs Phenom II X4 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G3258

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Phenom II X4 830 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,063 vs 2,072).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 830

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G3258 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3258 better than Phenom II X4 830?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3258 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 830 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 830 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3258 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3258 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 830 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3258 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G3258 vs Phenom II X4 830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G3258 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 830 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium G3258 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3258 scores 2,063 against the Phenom II X4 830's 2,072 — a 0.4% lead for the Phenom II X4 830. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 830.

Feature	Pentium G3258	Phenom II X4 830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,063	2,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3258 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G3258	Phenom II X4 830
Socket	LGA1150	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Pentium G3258) / not specified (Phenom II X4 830). The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X4 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop.