Core i7-610E
VS
Pentium G3258

Core i7-610E vs Pentium G3258

Intel

Core i7-610E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium G3258

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-610E is positioned at rank 1125 and the Pentium G3258 is on rank 632, so the Pentium G3258 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-610E

#1113
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3543%
#1114
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3492%
#1115
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3205%
#1116
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3191%
#1117
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3162%
#1119
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3053%
#1120
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2928%
#1121
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2923%
#1122
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2844%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
100%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
99%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
99%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
98%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
94%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3258

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11331%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10707%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7774%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2342%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1855%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
929%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
917%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
835%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
835%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
826%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
804%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
792%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
789%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
782%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#633
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#634
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#635
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#636
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#637
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#638
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core i7-610E shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore i7-610EPentium G3258
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-610E stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 44% cheaper ($40 vs $72) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-610EPentium G3258
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+81%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-610E and Pentium G3258

Intel

Core i7-610E

The Core i7-610E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 2,071 points. Launch price was $332.

Intel

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Processing Power

The Core i7-610E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G3258's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-610E versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.53 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-610E uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-610E scores 2,071 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-610E. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-610E vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258.

FeatureCore i7-610EPentium G3258
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.53 GHz
3.2 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,071
2,063
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-610E uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-610EPentium G3258
Socket
BGA1288
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-610E) / VT-x (Pentium G3258). The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core i7-610E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-610EPentium G3258
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-610E launched at $250 MSRP, while the Pentium G3258 debuted at $75. At current prices ($40 vs $72), the Core i7-610E is $32 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-610E delivers 51.8 pts/$ vs 28.7 pts/$ for the Pentium G3258 — making the Core i7-610E the 57.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-610EPentium G3258
MSRP
$250
$75-70%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-44%
$72
Performance per Dollar
51.8+80%
28.7
Release Date
2010
2014