Pentium G4560
VS
A10-7870K

Pentium G4560 vs A10-7870K

Intel

Pentium G4560

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
VS
AMD

A10-7870K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G4560 is positioned at rank 385 and the A10-7870K is on rank 368, so the A10-7870K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G4560

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5642%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5331%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3871%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1166%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
924%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
808%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
463%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
457%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
416%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
416%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
411%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
400%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
395%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
393%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
389%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
100%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
99%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
99%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
97%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
100%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
98%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
97%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
97%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5335%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5041%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3660%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1103%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
873%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
764%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
438%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
432%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
393%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
393%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
389%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
378%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
373%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
372%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
368%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
100%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
100%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
99%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
98%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
97%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
96%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
95%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
95%
#368
A10-7870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G4560 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium G4560A10-7870K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-7870K (2015) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium G4560A10-7870K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G4560 and A10-7870K

Intel

Pentium G4560

The Pentium G4560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,536 points. Launch price was $108.

AMD

A10-7870K

The A10-7870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 28 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

The Pentium G4560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-7870K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4560 versus 4.1 GHz on the A10-7870K — a 15.8% clock advantage for the A10-7870K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Pentium G4560 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A10-7870K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G4560 scores 3,536 against the A10-7870K's 3,506 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium G4560. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4560 vs 0 kB on the A10-7870K.

FeaturePentium G4560A10-7870K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz+17%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark
3,536
3,506
Geekbench 6 Single
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G4560 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-7870K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Pentium G4560 versus DDR3-2133 on the A10-7870K — the Pentium G4560 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4560 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeaturePentium G4560A10-7870K
Socket
LGA1151
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7870K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4560) vs AMD-V (A10-7870K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 610 (Pentium G4560) and Radeon R7 (A10-7870K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4560 targets Desktop, A10-7870K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7870K rivals Core i3-4370.

FeaturePentium G4560A10-7870K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Budget