Pentium G645 vs Pentium M 735

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G645 vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G645 vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G645

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 265.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,450 vs 1,459).
❌209.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 21W.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 21W instead of 65W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G645 better than Pentium M 735?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G645 is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G645 is the better buy right now. Pentium G645 comes in $214 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium M 735 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 265.2% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 5.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G645 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G645 vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G645

The Pentium G645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G645 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium G645 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G645 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 52.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G645 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Pentium G645 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G645 scores 1,450 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G645 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.

Feature	Pentium G645	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+71%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+71%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,450	1,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G645 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G645	Pentium M 735
Socket	LGA1155	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	—	2 GB
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium G645) / None (Pentium M 735). Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.

Feature	Pentium G645	Pentium M 735
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	None
Target Use	—	Mobile Legacy

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium G645 was priced at $80, while the Pentium M 735 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($80 vs $294), Pentium G645 was $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G645 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 5.0 pts/$ for the Pentium M 735 — making the Pentium G645 the 114% better value option.

Feature	Pentium G645	Pentium M 735
MSRP	$80-73%	$294
Performance per Dollar	18.1+262%	5.0
Release Date	2012	2004

Search Pentium G645 on Amazon

Search Pentium M 735 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.