Pentium G645 vs Phenom X3 8750

Intel

Pentium G645

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8750

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008

Pentium G645 vs Phenom X3 8750 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G645 vs Phenom X3 8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G645 vs Phenom X3 8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G645

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $115 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 144.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom X3 8750

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,450).
    • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
    • ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium G645 better than Phenom X3 8750?
    Yes. Pentium G645 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium G645 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G645 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium G645 is the better buy right now. Pentium G645 comes in $115 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 144.6% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium G645 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium G645 vs Phenom X3 8750 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium G645

    The Pentium G645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $80.

    AMD

    Phenom X3 8750

    The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Pentium G645 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8750 offers 3 cores / 3 threads β€” the Phenom X3 8750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G645 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X3 8750 β€” a 18.9% clock advantage for the Pentium G645. The Pentium G645 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G645 scores 1,450 against the Phenom X3 8750's 1,445 β€” a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G645. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G645 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750.

    FeaturePentium G645Phenom X3 8750
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    3 / 3+50%
    Boost Clock
    2.9 GHz+21%
    2.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.9 GHz
    β€”
    L3 Cache
    3 MB (total)+50%
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    512 kB (per core)+100%
    Process
    32 nm-51%
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013)
    Toliman (2008)
    PassMark
    1,450
    1,445
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium G645 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium G645Phenom X3 8750
    Socket
    LGA1155
    AM2+
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    πŸ’°

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Pentium G645 was priced at $80, while the Phenom X3 8750 came in at $195. On launch pricing ($80 vs $195), Pentium G645 was $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G645 delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Phenom X3 8750 β€” making the Pentium G645 the 83.9% better value option.

    FeaturePentium G645Phenom X3 8750
    MSRP
    $80-59%
    $195
    Performance per Dollar
    18.1+145%
    7.4
    Release Date
    2012
    2008

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.