Core i7-620LM
VS
Pentium G645

Core i7-620LM vs Pentium G645

Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium G645

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-620LM is positioned at rank 1208 and the Pentium G645 is on rank 838, so the Pentium G645 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620LM

#1196
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6012%
#1197
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5924%
#1198
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5439%
#1199
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5414%
#1200
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5364%
#1202
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5180%
#1203
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4967%
#1204
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4959%
#1205
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4826%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
100%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
95%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
85%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G645

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17193%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16246%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11796%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3554%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2815%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2462%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1410%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1392%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1267%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1267%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1253%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1219%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1202%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1197%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1187%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#839
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
100%
#840
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#841
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#842
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
99%
#843
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#844
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
99%
#845
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#846
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#847
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#848
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
98%
#850
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
98%
#851
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G645 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-620LM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-620LMPentium G645
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium G645 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 95% cheaper ($15 vs $300) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-620LMPentium G645
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1882%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-620LM and Pentium G645

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Intel

Pentium G645

The Pentium G645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Core i7-620LM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G645's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G645 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G645 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-620LM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G645 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620LM scores 1,463 against the Pentium G645's 1,450 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-620LM. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G645.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPentium G645
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,463
1,450
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620LM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G645 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPentium G645
Socket
BGA1288
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM) / not specified (Pentium G645). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium G645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPentium G645
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-620LM launched at $300 MSRP, while the Pentium G645 debuted at $80.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPentium G645
MSRP
$300
$80-73%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2010
2012