Core i7-620LM vs Turion II P560

Core i7-620LM vs Turion II P560 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-620LM

2 / 4

1,463

+0.5%

1,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-620LM vs Turion II P560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-620LM vs Turion II P560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-620LM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Turion II P560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Turion II P560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1150% higher power demand at 25W vs 2W.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,463).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620LM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-620LM better than Turion II P560?

Yes. Core i7-620LM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-620LM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-620LM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-620LM is the better buy right now. Core i7-620LM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-620LM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-620LM vs Turion II P560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-620LM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II P560's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II P560 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM. The Core i7-620LM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion II P560 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620LM scores 1,463 against the Turion II P560's 1,455 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-620LM.

Feature	Core i7-620LM	Turion II P560
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,463	1,455
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620LM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II P560 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-620LM	Turion II P560
Socket	BGA1288	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM) / not specified (Turion II P560). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Turion II P560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.