Core i5-4300Y vs Core i7-620LM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4300Y vs Core i7-620LM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4300Y vs Core i7-620LM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4300Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620LM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-620LM

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Core i5-4300Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,463 vs 1,485).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i5-4300Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-620LM better than Core i5-4300Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-620LM is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300Y pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Core i7-620LM also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-620LM is the better buy right now. Core i7-620LM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4300Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4300Y vs Core i7-620LM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4300Y

The Core i5-4300Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4300Y and Core i7-620LM share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300Y versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4300Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-620LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4300Y scores 1,485 against the Core i7-620LM's 1,463 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i5-4300Y. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4300Y vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM.

Feature	Core i5-4300Y	Core i7-620LM
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.8 GHz+22%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,485+2%	1,463
Geekbench 6 Single	—	450
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	900

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4300Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-620LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4300Y	Core i7-620LM
Socket	FCBGA1168	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-4300Y) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core i5-4300Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.