PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-620LM vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-620LM vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-620LM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium M 735 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
2% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
❌19% higher power demand at 25W vs 21W.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 21W instead of 25W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,459 vs 1,463).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620LM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-620LM better than Pentium M 735?

Yes. Core i7-620LM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-620LM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-620LM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-620LM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-620LM comes in 2.0% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium M 735 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2004 platform. Even with 1.8% better value on paper (5.0 vs 4.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-620LM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-620LM vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-620LM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i7-620LM has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 48.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-620LM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620LM scores 1,463 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-620LM. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.

Feature	Core i7-620LM	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+65%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,463	1,459
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620LM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-620LM versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the Core i7-620LM supports -420.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-620LM supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-620LM) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-620LM) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the Core i7-620LM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-620LM	Pentium M 735
Socket	BGA1288	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM) vs None (Pentium M 735). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget, Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

Feature	Core i7-620LM	Pentium M 735
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	None
Target Use	Budget	Mobile Legacy

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-620LM was priced at $300, while the Pentium M 735 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($300 vs $294), Pentium M 735 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-620LM delivers 4.9 pts/$ vs 5.0 pts/$ for the Pentium M 735 — making the Pentium M 735 the 1.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-620LM	Pentium M 735
MSRP	$300	$294-2%
Performance per Dollar	4.9	5.0+2%
Release Date	2010	2004

Search Core i7-620LM on Amazon

Search Pentium M 735 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.