Pentium G6951 vs Pentium N3710

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G6951 vs Pentium N3710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G6951 vs Pentium N3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G6951

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 80.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,383 vs 1,386).
❌3550% higher power demand at 73W vs 2W.

Pentium N3710

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 73W, a 71W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3710 better than Pentium G6951?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G6951 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3710 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3710 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3710 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium N3710 comes in 80.9% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Pentium G6951 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 80.5% better value on paper (15.5 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium G6951 vs Pentium N3710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G6951

The Pentium G6951 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,383 points. Launch price was $94.

Pentium N3710

The Pentium N3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,386 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G6951 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3710 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6951 versus 2.56 GHz on the Pentium N3710 — a 9% clock advantage for the Pentium G6951 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium G6951 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3710 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G6951 scores 1,383 against the Pentium N3710's 1,386 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium N3710. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G6951 vs 0 kB on the Pentium N3710.

Feature	Pentium G6951	Pentium N3710
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+9%	2.56 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+75%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Clarkdale (2010−2011)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,383	1,386

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G6951 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3710 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G6951	Pentium N3710
Socket	LGA1156	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium G6951 was priced at $89, while the Pentium N3710 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($89 vs $161), Pentium G6951 was $72 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G6951 delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Pentium N3710 — making the Pentium G6951 the 57.4% better value option.

Feature	Pentium G6951	Pentium N3710
MSRP	$89-45%	$161
Performance per Dollar	15.5+80%	8.6
Release Date	2010	2016

Search Pentium G6951 on Amazon

Search Pentium N3710 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.