Pentium M 1.70
VS
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Pentium M 1.70 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Intel

Pentium M 1.70

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.70 is positioned at rank 161 and the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is on rank 980, so the Pentium M 1.70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.70

#149
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
337%
#150
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
332%
#151
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
305%
#152
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
304%
#153
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
301%
#155
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
291%
#156
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
279%
#157
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
278%
#158
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
271%
#161
Pentium M 1.70
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

#968
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1956%
#969
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1927%
#970
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1769%
#971
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1761%
#972
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1745%
#974
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1685%
#975
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1616%
#976
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1613%
#977
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1570%
#980
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
97%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
96%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
96%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 1.70 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium M 1.70Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 1.70Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.70 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Intel

Pentium M 1.70

The Pentium M 1.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.70 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 1.70 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. The Pentium M 1.70 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.70 scores 435 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+'s 450 — a 3.4% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.

FeaturePentium M 1.70Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
2 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K
Process
130 nm
Architecture
Banias (2003)
Oakville (2003−2004)
PassMark
435
450+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 1.70 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 1.70Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Socket
PGA478
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
2
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 1.70) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.

FeaturePentium M 1.70Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false