Pentium M 1.70
VS
Opteron 142

Pentium M 1.70 vs Opteron 142

Intel

Pentium M 1.70

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Opteron 142

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.70 is positioned at rank 161 and the Opteron 142 is on rank 1025, so the Pentium M 1.70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.70

#149
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
337%
#150
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
332%
#151
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
305%
#152
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
304%
#153
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
301%
#155
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
291%
#156
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
279%
#157
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
278%
#158
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
271%
#161
Pentium M 1.70
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 142

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
136726%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
25815%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
22936%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
17718%
#1025
Opteron 142
MSRP: $292|Avg: $20
100%
#1026
Athlon MP 2800+
MSRP: $275|Avg: $10
91%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
88%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
87%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
82%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
45%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
45%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
30%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
18%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium M 1.70 leads in gaming performance. However, the Opteron 142 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 1.70Opteron 142
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 1.70Opteron 142
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.70 and Opteron 142

Intel

Pentium M 1.70

The Pentium M 1.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron 142

The Opteron 142 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.70 and Opteron 142 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 1.70 versus 1.6 GHz on the Opteron 142 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Pentium M 1.70. The Pentium M 1.70 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 142 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.70 scores 435 against the Opteron 142's 445 — a 2.3% lead for the Opteron 142. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 1.70Opteron 142
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz+6%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
Banias (2003)
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark
435
445+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 1.70 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 142 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 1.70Opteron 142
Socket
PGA478
940
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 1.70) / AMD-V (Opteron 142). Primary use case: Opteron 142 targets Server.

FeaturePentium M 1.70Opteron 142
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Server