Pentium M 715
VS
Celeron D 352

Pentium M 715 vs Celeron D 352

Intel

Pentium M 715

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2004
VS
Intel

Celeron D 352

1 Cores1 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 715 is positioned at rank 759 and the Celeron D 352 is on rank 1062, so the Pentium M 715 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 715

#747
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1087%
#748
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1071%
#749
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
983%
#750
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
979%
#751
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
970%
#753
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
936%
#754
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
898%
#755
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
896%
#756
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
872%
#759
Pentium M 715
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
#773
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
51438%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
48604%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
35290%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10632%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8421%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7367%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4219%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4164%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3791%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3749%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3648%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3597%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3582%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3550%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
100%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
97%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
97%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
95%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
94%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
93%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
93%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
89%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
83%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
81%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
78%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
76%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
71%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron D 352 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 715 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium M 715Celeron D 352
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 715Celeron D 352
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 715 and Celeron D 352

Intel

Pentium M 715

The Pentium M 715 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 715 and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 715 versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 72.3% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Pentium M 715 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 715 scores 405 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 3.2% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 715Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+113%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+113%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark
405
418+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 715 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 715 versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron D 352 supports up to 4 of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Pentium M 715) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Chipset compatibility: Socket 479 (Pentium M 715) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).

FeaturePentium M 715Celeron D 352
Socket
PGA478
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
800+39900%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB+52428700%
4
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support false virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeaturePentium M 715Celeron D 352
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
false
Target Use
Budget