Pentium M 780
VS
Athlon 64 3500+

Pentium M 780 vs Athlon 64 3500+

Intel

Pentium M 780

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3500+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 780 is positioned at rank 807 and the Athlon 64 3500+ is on rank 1102, so the Pentium M 780 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 780

#795
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1225%
#796
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1207%
#797
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1108%
#798
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1103%
#799
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1093%
#801
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1055%
#802
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1012%
#803
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1010%
#804
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
983%
#807
Pentium M 780
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3500+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
148436%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
140257%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
101838%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
30680%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
24301%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
21259%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
12176%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
12017%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10941%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
10819%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
10527%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
10380%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
10338%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
10244%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
100%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
93%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
91%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
89%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
87%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
85%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
80%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
75%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
70%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
69%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
67%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
60%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
60%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
60%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
59%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
58%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 64 3500+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 780 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 780Athlon 64 3500+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 780Athlon 64 3500+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 780 and Athlon 64 3500+

Intel

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 64 3500+

The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 780 and Athlon 64 3500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3500+ — a 194.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3500+. The Pentium M 780 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 3500+ uses San Diego (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 780 scores 575 against the Athlon 64 3500+'s 570 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium M 780. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 780Athlon 64 3500+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.03 GHz
2.2 GHz+7233%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
90 nm-31%
130 nm
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
San Diego (2001−2005)
PassMark
575
570
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 780 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 3500+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 780 versus DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3500+ — the Pentium M 780 supports -202% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium M 780) vs 0 (Athlon 64 3500+) — the Pentium M 780 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 780) and AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3500+).

FeaturePentium M 780Athlon 64 3500+
Socket
PGA478
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Pentium M 780) / not specified (Athlon 64 3500+).

FeaturePentium M 780Athlon 64 3500+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false