Pentium M 780 vs Turion 64 ML-40

Pentium M 780 vs Turion 64 ML-40 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 780

1 / 1

575

0.0%

600

+4.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 780 vs Turion 64 ML-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 780 vs Turion 64 ML-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 780

2005

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 ML-40 across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (575 vs 600).
❌2600% higher power demand at 27W vs 1W.

Turion 64 ML-40

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 27W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-40 better than Pentium M 780?

Yes. Turion 64 ML-40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 ML-40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 43 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-40 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 ML-40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 ML-40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 780 vs Turion 64 ML-40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 ML-40

The Turion 64 ML-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-40 — a 194.6% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-40. The Pentium M 780 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-40 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 780 scores 575 against the Turion 64 ML-40's 600 — a 4.3% lead for the Turion 64 ML-40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 780	Turion 64 ML-40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	0.03 GHz	2.2 GHz+7233%
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	575	600+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 780 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 ML-40 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.