Opteron 248 vs Pentium M 780

Opteron 248 vs Pentium M 780 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 248

1 / 1

585

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 780

1 / 1

575

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 248 vs Pentium M 780 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 248 vs Pentium M 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 248

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌229.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 27W.

Pentium M 780

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 27W instead of 89W, a 62W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 248 across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (575 vs 585).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 248 better than Pentium M 780?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium M 780 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 248 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 31 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 248 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 248 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 248 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 780 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 248 vs Pentium M 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 248 and Pentium M 780 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 versus 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 — a 194.6% clock advantage for the Opteron 248. The Opteron 248 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 780 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 248 scores 585 against the Pentium M 780's 575 — a 1.7% lead for the Opteron 248. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 248	Pentium M 780
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+7233%	0.03 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	585+2%	575

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 248 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 780 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.