Opteron 248 vs Xeon 3.20
Opteron 248
Xeon 3.20
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 248 is positioned at rank 726 and the Xeon 3.20 is on rank 1030, so the Opteron 248 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 248
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.20
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 248 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 248 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 248 and Xeon 3.20
Opteron 248
The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.
Xeon 3.20
The Xeon 3.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 248 and Xeon 3.20 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 3.20 — a 37% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.20. The Opteron 248 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Xeon 3.20 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 248 scores 585 against the Xeon 3.20's 575 — a 1.7% lead for the Opteron 248. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron 248 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.20.
| Feature | Opteron 248 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Gallatin (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 585+2% | 575 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 248 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 3.20 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 248 | Xeon 3.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 940 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 248 and Xeon 3.20
