Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Opteron 248

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Opteron 248 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 / 2

615

+5.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Opteron 248

1 / 1

585

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Opteron 248 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Opteron 248: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2009

Why buy it

✅+5.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Opteron 248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 248

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (585 vs 615).
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L325 better than Opteron 248?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L325 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 248 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L325 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Opteron 248 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 248 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 versus 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 248. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Opteron 248 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L325 scores 615 against the Opteron 248's 585 — a 5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L325.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L325	Opteron 248
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.2 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Congo (2009)	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark	615+5%	585

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 248 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.