Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 ML-44

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 ML-44 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 / 2

615

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 ML-44

1 / 1

645

+4.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 ML-44 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 ML-44: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 ML-44 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (615 vs 645).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-44 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-44

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-44 better than Athlon Neo X2 L325?

Yes. Turion 64 ML-44 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 ML-44 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-44 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-44 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 ML-44 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo X2 L325 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L325 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 ML-44 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 ML-44

The Turion 64 ML-44 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-44 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-44 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-44. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L325 scores 615 against the Turion 64 ML-44's 645 — a 4.8% lead for the Turion 64 ML-44.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L325	Turion 64 ML-44
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	615	645+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.