Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 MT-40

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 MT-40 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 / 2

615

+2.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 MT-40

1 / 1

600

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 MT-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 MT-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2009

Why buy it

✅+2.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 MT-40

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (600 vs 615).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L325 better than Turion 64 MT-40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 MT-40 is ahead with 46.7% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L325 pulls ahead with 2.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L325 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion 64 MT-40 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 46.7% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L325 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Turion 64 MT-40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 MT-40

The Turion 64 MT-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 MT-40 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-40 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Turion 64 MT-40. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-40 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L325 scores 615 against the Turion 64 MT-40's 600 — a 2.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L325.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L325	Turion 64 MT-40
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.2 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	615+3%	600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 MT-40 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.