Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Athlon Neo X2 L325
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is positioned at rank 1185 and the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is on rank 321, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L325
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon Neo X2 L325 | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon Neo X2 L325 | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Athlon Neo X2 L325
The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon Neo X2 L325 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L325 scores 615 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+'s 622 — a 1.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L325 | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | — |
| Architecture | Congo (2009) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 615 | 622+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Neo X2 L325) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L325) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+).
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L325 | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | ASB1 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | 400+19900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+209715100% | 2 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L325) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3700+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L325 | Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
