Opteron 248 vs Pentium D 830

Opteron 248 vs Pentium D 830 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 248

1 / 1

585

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium D 830

2 / 2

618

+5.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 248 vs Pentium D 830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 248 vs Pentium D 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 248

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 89W instead of 130W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (585 vs 618).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium D 830.

Pentium D 830

2005

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Opteron 248.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $316 MSRP, while Opteron 248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌46.1% higher power demand at 130W vs 89W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium D 830 better than Opteron 248?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium D 830 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium D 830 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 36.4% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium D 830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium D 830 is the better buy right now. Pentium D 830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $316 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.6% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium D 830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 248 vs Pentium D 830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

Pentium D 830

The Pentium D 830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 618 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 248 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium D 830 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium D 830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium D 830 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Pentium D 830. The Opteron 248 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium D 830 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 248 scores 585 against the Pentium D 830's 618 — a 5.5% lead for the Pentium D 830. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 248	Pentium D 830
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	585	618+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	151
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	341

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 248 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium D 830 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.