Pentium M 780
VS
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Pentium M 780 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Intel

Pentium M 780

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 780 is positioned at rank 807 and the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is on rank 1055, so the Pentium M 780 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 780

#795
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1225%
#796
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1207%
#797
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1108%
#798
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1103%
#799
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1093%
#801
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1055%
#802
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1012%
#803
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1010%
#804
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
983%
#807
Pentium M 780
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

#1043
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2692%
#1044
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2652%
#1045
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2435%
#1046
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2424%
#1047
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2402%
#1049
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2319%
#1050
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2224%
#1051
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2220%
#1052
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2161%
#1055
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
100%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
99%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
99%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
98%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
97%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
96%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
95%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 780 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 5.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 780Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / Standard Node)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 780Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 780 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Intel

Pentium M 780

The Pentium M 780 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 780 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Pentium M 780 versus 2.2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ — a 194.6% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. The Pentium M 780 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005). In PassMark, the Pentium M 780 scores 575 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+'s 545 — a 5.4% lead for the Pentium M 780.

FeaturePentium M 780Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.03 GHz
2.2 GHz+7233%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Process
90 nm
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark
575+6%
545
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 780 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 780 versus 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium M 780 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Pentium M 780) vs 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium M 780) vs 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+) — the Pentium M 780 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 780) and 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3400+).

FeaturePentium M 780Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Socket
PGA478
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
400+19900%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+209715100%
2
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support false virtualization. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ rivals Pentium M 735.

FeaturePentium M 780Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
false