Pentium N3510
VS
Celeron G440

Pentium N3510 vs Celeron G440

Intel

Pentium N3510

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3510 is positioned at rank 1180 and the Celeron G440 is on rank 625, so the Celeron G440 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3510

#1168
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4542%
#1169
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4475%
#1170
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4108%
#1171
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4090%
#1172
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4052%
#1174
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3913%
#1175
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3752%
#1176
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3746%
#1177
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3646%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
100%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
97%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
95%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
94%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
93%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
93%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
91%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
87%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11145%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10531%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7646%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2303%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1825%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1596%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
914%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
902%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
822%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
821%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
812%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
790%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
779%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
776%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
769%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
99%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
100%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
99%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
99%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
98%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
98%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium N3510 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G440 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium N3510Celeron G440
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron G440 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $161), it costs 97% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 3105% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium N3510.
InsightPentium N3510Celeron G440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3105%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3510 and Celeron G440

Intel

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3510 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G440 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium N3510 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium N3510 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G440 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3510 scores 1,040 against the Celeron G440's 1,035 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium N3510 vs 1 MB on the Celeron G440.

FeaturePentium N3510Celeron G440
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+300%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,040
1,035
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3510 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G440 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3510Celeron G440
Socket
FCBGA1170
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium N3510) / VT-x (Celeron G440). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.

FeaturePentium N3510Celeron G440
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium N3510 launched at $161 MSRP, while the Celeron G440 debuted at $37. At current prices ($161 vs $5), the Celeron G440 is $156 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium N3510 delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 207.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G440 — making the Celeron G440 the 187.9% better value option.

FeaturePentium N3510Celeron G440
MSRP
$161
$37-77%
Avg Price (30d)
$161
$5-97%
Performance per Dollar
6.5
207.0+3085%
Release Date
2013
2011