Pentium N3510
VS
E2-3200

Pentium N3510 vs E2-3200

Intel

Pentium N3510

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E2-3200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium N3510 is positioned at rank 1180 and the E2-3200 is on rank 855, so the E2-3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3510

#1168
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4542%
#1169
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4475%
#1170
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4108%
#1171
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4090%
#1172
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4052%
#1174
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3913%
#1175
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3752%
#1176
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3746%
#1177
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3646%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
100%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
97%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
95%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
94%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
93%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
93%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
91%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
87%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-3200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17812%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16831%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12221%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3682%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2916%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2551%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1461%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1442%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1313%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1313%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1298%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1263%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1246%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1241%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1229%
#855
E2-3200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
100%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
99%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
99%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
99%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
99%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
99%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
98%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
98%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
97%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
97%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
97%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
95%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E2-3200 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium N3510 in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium N3510E2-3200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium N3510E2-3200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($0)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium N3510 and E2-3200

Intel

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

AMD

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Pentium N3510 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the E2-3200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 versus 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the E2-3200 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Pentium N3510 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-3200 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium N3510 scores 1,040 against the E2-3200's 1,050 — a 1% lead for the E2-3200. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium N3510 vs 0 kB on the E2-3200.

FeaturePentium N3510E2-3200
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,040
1,050
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium N3510 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-3200 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium N3510E2-3200
Socket
FCBGA1170
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0